KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA KELAS V SD PADA TEMA EKOSISTEM DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN

Sumarli Sumarli; Insan Suwanto; Wiwit Wiwit

doi:10.21154/ibriez.v7i2.273

Authors

Sumarli Sumarli Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Singkawang
Insan Suwanto Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Singkawang
Wiwit Wiwit Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Singkawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21154/ibriez.v7i2.273

Keywords:

Creative Thinking Ability;, Personality Type;, Ecosystem Theme

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) describe the creative thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students on the ecosystem theme in terms of personality type; (2) Describe the factors that affect the creative thinking ability of fifth grade elementary school students. This research method is a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects in this study were 12 fifth grade students at SDN 26 Singkawang which consisted of 3 students in the sanguine personality type category, 3 students in the chorelic personality type category, 3 students in the melancholic personality type category, and 3 students in the phlegmatic personality type category. The data collection technique in this study was a test technique in the form of a student's creative thinking ability sheet and The non-test technique is in the form of a student personality type questionnaire and interviews. The data analysis technique uses the analysis technique by Miles and Huberman which consists of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that: (1) The creative thinking ability of students in the sanguine personality type did not master the indicators of flexibility and did not master the indicators of fluency, originality, and elaboration. Students with the corelis personality type do not master the indicators of fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Students in the melancholic personality type have mastered the elaboration indicator, lack the fluency indicator, and do not master the flexibility and originality indicators. Students in the phlegmatic personality type do not master the indicators of fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration. (2) Factors that affect students' creative thinking abilities are caused by internal and external factors. Internal factors, namely students do not understand the material that has been studied, students do not understand the material about ecosystems, do not like science subjects so that their creative thinking skills are not satisfactory, students are not able to answer and develop their ideas to solve the problems given, and students are less able to answer and develop their ideas to solve the problems given.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Yani. Mindset Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Alfabeta CV, 2014.

Baharuddin dan Esa Nur Wahyuni. Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2010.

Ebiendele Ebosele Peter. “Critical Thinking: Essence for Teaching Mathematics and Mathematics Problem Solving Skills.” African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research 5, no. 3 (2012): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajmcsr11.161.

Fitria, Camelina, and Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono. “Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian (Sanguinis, Koleris, Melankolis, Dan Phlegmatis).” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika 3, no. 3 (2014): 23–32.

Florence Littauer. Personality Plus (Kepribadian Plus). Bagaimana Memahami Orang Lain Dengan Memahami Diri Anda Sendiri. Tangerang: Karisma Publishing Group, 2011.

Hamidah, Nur, Susanto, and Erfan Yudianto. “Kecerdasan Visual Spasial Siswa Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Hippocrates-Galenus.” Saintifika 20, no. 2 (2018): I-I0. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/STF/article/download/9740/6398.

Hidayah, Nur, Prasetyo Budi Darmono, and Wharyanti Ika Purwaningsih. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP Kelas VII Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika.” Pythagoras: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika 9, no. 2 (2020): 114–23. https://www.journal.unrika.ac.id/index.php/jurnalphythagoras/article/view/2644.

Humaeroh, I K A. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Materi Elektrokimia Melalui Model Open-Ended Problems.” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2016.

Malisa, Shella, Iriani Bakti, and Rilia Iriani. “Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (Cps) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa.” Vidya Karya 33, no. 1 (2018): 1. https://doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v33i1.5388.

Marhami. “Membangun Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Komunikasi Matematis Melalui Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning.” Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 2015, 149–54.

Murdani, E., and S. Sumarli. “Student Learning by Experiment Method for Analyzing the Dynamic Electrical Circuit and Its Application in Daily Life.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1153, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012119.

Ratnasari, Devi, Proses Berpikir, Kreatif Siswa, Devi Ratnasari, Dinawati Trapsilasiwi, Program Studi, Pendidikan Matematika, and Universitas Jember Unej. “Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Berdasarkan Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Memecahkan Soal Cerita Sub Pokok Bahasan Keliling Dan Luas Segi Empat Berbasis Tahapan Wallas.” Kadikma 1, no. 1 (2015): 1–5.

Rijal, Syamsu, and Suhaedir Bachtiar. “Hubungan Antara Sikap, Kemandirian Belajar, Dan Gaya Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa.” Jurnal Bioedukatika 3, no. 2 (2015): 15. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v3i2.4149.

Sari, Putri Mayang, and Sumarli Sumarli. “Optimalisasi Pemahaman Konsep Belajar IPA Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Dengan Metode Gallery Walk (Sebuah Studi Literatur).” Journal of Educational Review and Research 2, no. 1 (2019): 69. https://doi.org/10.26737/jerr.v2i1.1859.

Sekar, D. K. S., Pudjawan, K., & Margunayasa, I. G. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dalam Pembelajaran IPA pada Siswa Kelas IV di SD Negeri 2 Pemaron Kecamatan Buleleng.” Mimbar PGSD Undiksha 3 (2015). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v3i1.5823.

Septianawati, Desty, Yadi Ardiawan, Prodi Pendidikan, Matematika Ikip, Pgri Pontianak, Jl Ampera, and No Pontianak. “Eksperimentasi Metode Diskusi Dengan Pendekatan Quantum Learning Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains 3, no. 2 (2014): 104–14.

Setyoningsih, Luki Apriliya. “Digital Repository Repository Universitas Universitas Jember Jember Digital Digital Repository Repository Universitas Universitas Jember Jember.” Digital Repository Universitas Jember, no. September 2019 (2018): 2019–22.

Suherni, S. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP.” UIN RADEN FATAH PALEMBANG, 2019. http://repository.radenfatah.ac.id/id/eprint/5069.

Sumarli, Sumarli. “Analisis Model Pembelajaran Tipe Think-Pair-Share Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa.” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika) 3, no. 1 (2018): 8. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v3i1.335.